His latest missive is about my post on the SEIU endorsements favoring some of the more conservative elements of the council candidates.
Dem Party blogger Braisted wrings his hands over the local service union's local endorsements and tries to portray them as conservative because they weren't embracing his candidates. He also compares them to the other unions in an attempt to single them out for their lack of conformity.Yes, as the "Dem Party blogger" (I'll be getting that check any day now I suppose), I had the audacity to characterize Republican council members and candidates like Crafton, Dominy, Duvall and Jakes as conservatives (a description from what I've seen none of them oppose or object to).
Let's take my post line by line.
The Service Employees International Union released its list of endorsements which offer perhaps some of the most conservative choices to date from any of the various labor union picks to date, including Eric Crafton and Ken Jakes in the at-large race, as well as Republicans Duane Dominy and Robert Duvall in the district races against some of their more progressive, union-friendly supporters.Now, which part of that statement is not true? That the SEIU has endorsed more conservatives than the other labor organizations to date? I don't think this is a biased statement really, unless someone cares to disagree with this assessment. As for their opponents being more progressive and union-friendly, perhaps this is more subjective, however, other labor organizations seem to agree.
So, instead of simply expounding my own thoughts about the matter, I contacted the SEIU to get to their reasoning. I primarily asked about Ken Jakes and Robert Duvall, because I assumed they supported Crafton and Dominy over their objections to the janitors privatization and the convention center, which SEIU opposed. But looking at the votes Duvall voted for the budget which would've led to janitor privatization, and Ken Jakes didn't vote on it at all. (I also asked about District 7 and 8, but those comments were OTR).
I spoke with Freda Player with the SEIU who explained that with regards to Ken Jakes, his populist message resonated with many of their membership (he is a Man of the People after all) and Duvall, while conservative politically, has been with them on many issues when they needed him to be.There it is...no real response or opinion on my part, just their side of the story. And that was the be all and end all of my post. How Byrd turned it into some multi-paragraph missive about fealty and support for Karl Dean (who wasn't even mentioned) is rather beyond me.
I've made no secret about where my support is, I like Karl Dean, but I like him in opposition to some of the more conservative elements of municipal politics like Dominy, Crafton, Duvall, and others. Does that mean I love him like a fat kid loves cake as 50 Cent would say? No, not particularly. I like him, and unless or until a better alternative comes along to sweep me off my feet, he's the best thing we got. So, I'll disagree when we disagree, but other than that, I'm not going to take one or two areas of disagreement and turn it into a blood feud of hatred like my friend from Salemtown.
Back to the SEIU, while I don't particularly like some of the candidates they've endorsed (and neither does Byrd apparently), I understand they are free to support who they think will support their causes. And politics being non-partisan in this council, they sometimes find that support from people who would likely be foes in a partisan body on the state or federal level. I respect their independence, but they put out the endorsements for all to see, so why political commentators like myself should be precluded from making observations about those endorsements is beyond me.







