The Sky is Falling
This morning, the monthly gathering young of young (and young at heart) Nashville progressives called the Kitchen Cabinet, was treated to a presentation by Rep. Jim Cooper -- the basic gist of which is that our generation is collectively ******.
Rep. Cooper laid out a presentation that he has given to various editorial boards, including the NYTimes and Wallstreet Journal, which says that our annual budget deficit is not $130Bn, rather $3T when standard marketplace accounting procedures are put into place. Also, without drastic changes in our Medicaid/Medicare and Social Security programs, we could see the tax rate as a percentage of our GDP rise drastically over the next 10-20 years, and see our bond rating slip below AAA status.
While the problems are fairly clear, the solutions presented were somewhat opaque. Even if the Government adopts standard accounting procedures when listing the budget deficit; that doesn't change the fact that the budget deficit exists. Short of drastic changes in our medical policy (and not just slight changes to the way people buy private health insurance, as is offered by the two Democratic candidates), its hard to see any short term solution to the medicare/medicaid problem. Short of raising the retirement age for social security (and returning it to what it was intended; an old age and disability insurance program) its hard to see any great fixes for that program either.
Unfortunately, the implicit need expressed by Congressman Cooper to fix our fiscal calamity is to have an engaged, far-sighted electorate as opposed to the passive, myopic voters we have now. We have all sorts of politicians who talk a good game when it comes to spending, but when it gets down to making tough choices, most are found wanting. Perhaps this is a problem inherent within a democratic republic. Politicians are making decisions based on the 'feelings' of their constituents rather than hard-headed statistical data. As an example, China wouldn't dare think about mothballing a multi-billion dollar project like Yucca Mountain because a few local residents had irrational fears...yet in our system of government if enough people have irrational fears, they are then justified by political leaders who put re-election above the good of our nation as a whole.
Also, in terms of military expenditures, we spend more than nearly all other countries in the world combined. And compared to our perceived threats (countries like North Korea, Iran, Cuba, and Syria) we spend almost 47 times as much. Why do we need new weapons systems every year when the ones we currently have are vastly superior to our allies, and exponentially superior to our enemies? Simple, because we want to maximize our killing efficiency while minimizing risk to troops. That means we'll always have the desire for new and better toys...not to mention the defense contractors who lobby Congress to have their toys built and purchased.
Similarly, groups like the AARP are opposed to addressing many of the problems inherent in our current system, and yet because senior citizens are the most energized voting block in American politics, most political leaders are afraid to go against this powerful lobbying group.
Ultimately, knowing all the problems we have, it is hard to imagine a solution that doesn't first involve the total collapse of our country. The great depression (and following World War) strengthened the resolve of an entire generation of Americans. It's unfortunate, but something similar might be required to wake up our current society to the dangers of fiscal recklessness. Or perhaps simply (though it wouldn't be simple at all) resetting the US Code and starting from scratch every 10 or 20 years would help us clean up some of our programs and policies to make it more efficient and streamlined.




8 comments:
Should have asked ol' blue dog coop why he is so keen on missile defense . . . one of the most egregious wastes o' money ol' coop - from his perch on the House Armed Svcs. Committee - seem to love so much.
FYI: don't believe the hype about social security . . . social security is solvent and you and I will receive our share when the time comes. The "crisis" is simply a non-existent right-wing (or blue dog) talking point - no great fixes are necessary (even greenspan acknowledged that much).
Either ol' coop is disingenuous or he's bought all the bs his buddies at owen have been feeding him.
2:44, you hit the nail on the head. Cooper votes consistently to the right of TN-05, someone needs to remind him he's not representing the 4th District any more.
Cooper needs to be primaried.
Sean, if you were pushing 50 (as I am), you wouldn't be so quick to throw the elderly (and near-elderly) under the bus.
And yes, I have a pension and 401K (and have had for 15 years).
Well, 'tis the elderly who are throwing my generation under the bus with their wanton disregard for fiscal responsibility.
Now, I don't think we should make changes to Social Security that would effect people who are 62 now, or soon to be retiring...but for people under, say, 45, I think we can consider bumping up the eligibility age.
If you look at the budget projections for the future, it is social programs like Medicare and Social Security that will grow at unbearable rates - not Defense. Now, I am all for cutting way back on defense. I think we should remove all over seas bases, and refuse to send Army personnel outside our country. Maintain the Air Force and Navy and let it be known that any country that attacks our country or our interests around the world will be bombed in retaliation. There is no need for a fighting force that can conquer new land. Use of the Army should be limited to protecting our borders.
Social Security and Medicare need serious adjustments. Provate accounts for younger citizens should be looked at for Social Security or some sort of means testing applied to it. Lets cut the false belief that SS was supposed to pay for retirement - it doesn't and it can't. Medicare is going to require even more drastic changes. The system simply cannot afford to give unlimited benifits to everyone.
You also have to remember that by when you cut defense spending, you are cutting American jobs at basically the same rate. Even though defense contractors make easy targets, they are often located in towns where they are the largest employer by a long shot. I think that defense spending is way too high, but we have to be careful before we just start hacking away at it without regard for who gets hurt in the end.
Congressman Cooper's fighting for fiscal responsibility is highly admirable, and while I don't think missile defense is a good use of our tax dollars, I generally think he's on the right track.
We can't rely on anyone's (any elected official's) sense of fiscal responsibility. In markets, including political markets, actors are driven by fairly short term payoffs - getting re-elected, consolidating power, and for the voters, getting stuff and programs. Neither can we rely on a better educated electorate. A more virtuous electorate perhaps, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Theoretically we can rely on a good Constitution that limits the power and authority of the central government, but that horse left the barnyard long ago.
Things don't wake people up so much as force change. Just as dramatically higher gas prices are inducing changes in driving behavior - $11 billion fewer miles in April than in April 2007 - budget realities will eventually necessitate change - raising the retirement age, privatizing all or part of SS etc.
Social security is sound . . . it has a dedicated tax and is more financially sound than just about anything else.
Krugman: "The Social Security trustees estimate the 75-year financial shortfall of the program at 0.7% of GDP. That compares with a general fund deficit – the federal deficit outside of Social Security – of 3.3% of GDP last year (that is, not even taking into account future demands on Medicare and Medicaid.) Social Security, in other words, is in much better financial shape than the rest of the government."
Just because someone repeats something over and over (ahem . . tax cuts pay for themselves) does not make it true . . .
runescape money runescape gold tibia item tibia gold runescape accounts tibia money runescape gp buy runescape gold tibia gold tibia item buy runescape money runescape items tibia money
Post a Comment